Frequent Emergence of Resistance Mutations Following Complex Intra-Host Genomic Dynamics in SARS-CoV-2 Patients Receiving Sotrovimab.

The emergence of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 represented a challenge to the treatment of COVID-19 using monoclonal antibodies. Only Sotrovimab maintained partial activity, allowing it to be used in high-risk patients infected with the Omicron variant. However, reports of resistance mutations to Sotrovimab demand efforts to better understand the intra-patient emergence of Sotrovimab resistance. A retrospective genomic analysis was conducted on respiratory samples from immunocompromised patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 who received Sotrovimab at our hospital between December 2021 and August 2022. The study involved 95 sequential specimens from 22 patients (1 to 12 samples/patient; 3 to 107 days post-infusion; threshold cycle [CT] ≤ 32). Resistance mutations (in P337, E340, K356, and R346) were detected in 68% of cases; the shortest time to detection of a resistance mutation was 5 days after Sotrovimab infusion. The dynamics of resistance acquisition were highly complex, with up to 11 distinct amino acid changes in specimens from the same patient. In two patients, the mutation distribution was compartmentalized in respiratory samples from different sources. This is the first study to examine the acquisition of Sotrovimab resistance in the BA.5 lineage, enabling us to determine the lack of genomic or clinical differences between Sotrovimab resistance in BA.5 relative to that in BA.1/2. Across all Omicron lineages, the acquisition of resistance delayed SARS-CoV-2 clearance (40.67 versus 19.5 days). Close, real-time genomic surveillance of patients receiving Sotrovimab should be mandatory to facilitate early therapeutic interventions.

Early SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections Involving the Same or Different Genomic Lineages, Spain.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines consider SARS-CoV-2 reinfection when sequential COVID-19 episodes occur >90 days apart. However, genomic diversity acquired over recent COVID-19 waves could mean previous infection provides insufficient cross-protection. We used genomic analysis to assess the percentage of early reinfections in a sample of 26 patients with 2 COVID-19 episodes separated by 20-45 days. Among sampled patients, 11 (42%) had reinfections involving different SARS-CoV-2 variants or subvariants. Another 4 cases were probable reinfections; 3 involved different strains from the same lineage or sublineage. Host genomic analysis confirmed the 2 sequential specimens belonged to the same patient. Among all reinfections, 36.4% involved non-Omicron, then Omicron lineages. Early reinfections showed no specific clinical patterns; 45% were among unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated persons, 27% were among persons <18 years of age, and 64% of patients had no risk factors. Time between sequential positive SARS-CoV-2 PCRs to consider reinfection should be re-evaluated.

Shared Mutations in Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Circulating Variants May Lead to Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)-Based Misidentification of B.1.351 and P.1 Variants of Concern.

Reverse transcription-PCRs (RT-PCRs) targeting SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern (VOC) mutations have been developed to simplify their tracking. We evaluated an assay targeting E484K/N501Y to identify B.1.351/P1. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) confirmed only 72 (59.02%) of 122 consecutive RT-PCR P.1/B.1.351 candidates. Prescreening RT-PCRs must target a wider set of mutations, updated from WGS data from emerging variants.

SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 Decline Is Not Driven by the Introduction of a More Successful Variant.

The SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern (VOC) Delta (B.617.2 lineage) displaced the predominant VOC Alpha (B.1.1.7 lineage) in the United Kingdom. In Madrid, recent start of the decline of predominant VOC Alpha suggested an equivalent phenomenon. However, 11 different variants, none overrepresented in frequency, occupied progressively over a period of 7 weeks the niche previously dominated by VOC Alpha. Only after these 7 weeks, VOC Delta started to emerge. Viral competition due to the entry of VOC Delta is not the major force driving the start of VOC Alpha decline in Madrid. IMPORTANCE Our data indicate that the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 VOCs turnover in our setting differ from those proposed for other countries. A systematic genomic analysis, updated on a weekly basis, of representative randomly selected samples of SARS-CoV-2 circulating variants allowed us to define a lapse of 7 weeks between the start of VOC Alpha decline and the final emergence of VOC Delta. During this period, VOC Alpha showed a sustained decline, while 11 VOCs, variants of interest (VOIs), and other identified variants, none overrepresented, occupied the niche left by VOC Alpha. Only after these 7 weeks, emergence of VOC Delta occurred, indicating that viral competition involving VOC Delta was not the exclusive direct driving force behind the starting of VOC Alpha decline.